Posts: 535
Threads: 31
Joined: Jul 2010
1: While there is no "quick fix", you can try the "town" field instead of the url field. It works quite well actually.
2: Possibly. I'll give it a shot myself after I get through a bunch of other things I have to do. (not too soon in other words)
EDIT: While Steven beat me to it, the town field is still better than the url field unless you want a link to the school's website, and you won't have to edit any files
I'm giving you three guesses...
Posts: 2,894
Threads: 59
Joined: Jun 2010
Yeah the town field would be better. I assumed you were already using that.
Have
you completed
the interview?
Posts: 36
Threads: 9
Joined: Nov 2010
Yes, I also need Town field
So waiting for a better solution, I will comment out the URL validation line, althought I do apreciate keeping the Web Site field
Posts: 535
Threads: 31
Joined: Jul 2010
Well, you can't really add fields without editing the database to accommodate them. The next best thing I can think of is having the school be entered along with the town. It works when you separate them with a dash.
I'm giving you three guesses...
Posts: 99
Threads: 30
Joined: May 2011
(03-Jan-2011, 08:56 PM)Static Wrote: Well, you can't really add fields without editing the database to accommodate them. The next best thing I can think of is having the school be entered along with the town. It works when you separate them with a dash.
Hm, not sure this is a good idea. Having mixed data in a DB field can cause DB problems during any SQL run ( I may be wrong? ) Personally, I'd rather wait for the custom fields to be included.
Posts: 2,894
Threads: 59
Joined: Jun 2010
1. What do you need the field(s) for?
2. Should its data be validated?
3. Do you want its data to be displayed? If so, where?
Have
you completed
the interview?
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2015
(14-May-2011, 06:54 PM)Steven Wrote: 1. What do you need the field(s) for?
2. Should its data be validated?
3. Do you want its data to be displayed? If so, where?
The answers to these questions really depend on the user. But I'd like to know if this feature is provided anytime soon. At the moment I'm afraid to create my own database columns because one day if the "new field" functionality is provided, it'd be a pain in the back to integrate existing data into the Commentics-generated field.
In my end;
1. A score field that allows the user to score the content out of 10 beside the comment.
2. It'll be a dropdown, or a Javascript shining clickable star thing, so no.
3. At the top of the comment body.
Posts: 2,894
Threads: 59
Joined: Jun 2010
At the moment I'm doing a complete re-write of all the code, as well as adding several new features, and hope to release by the end of this year. I'd like one of those new features to be extra fields so I'm going to see whether it can be done but a lot depends on how everything else goes. If it isn't added in the next version then it will be in the version or two after. In any case it may not be necessary for you to move the data from your own database columns. The data will still be accessible so it may just mean that the code that inserts and retrieves it is all that needs to be modified. It's also worth saying that the extra fields will only be for standard types (text, checkbox, select etc) so a star rating field won't be likely.
Have
you completed
the interview?